ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the preliminary revision of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) in Chinese undergraduates.Methods Considering the differences in the cultural and linguistic,the PHLMS was translated and used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 1 221 undergraduates.All participants were also surveyed with five facets mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ),the white bear suppression inventory (WBSI) and acceptance and action questionnaire-2rd edition (AAQ-Ⅱ) as conduct reliability and validity test.Results The exploratory factor analysis showed that PHLMS could extract two factors,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 40.355％.The confirmatory factor analysis indicated good fit (x2/df=2.781,CFI =0.945,NFI =0.884,IFI =0.922,TLI =0.906,CFI =0.922,RMSEA =0.053).The internal consistency reliability of the awareness subscales was 0.785,and the internal consistency reliability of the acceptance subscales was 0.772.The correlation coefficients among the PHLMS and FFMQ was significant(r=0.398,P＜0.01).The acceptance subscales were significantly negatively correlated with WBSI and AAQ-Ⅱ(r=-0.458,-0.288,P＜0.01).Conclusion The validity and reliability of the Chinese version of PHLMS meet the measurement criterion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese-version of the scale for the assessment of illness behavior(SAIB) in Chinese medical college students. Methods In view of the professional and cultural basis of the translation of SAIB,723 medical students were asked to complete the SAIB and the Illness Attitude Scale. After two weeks,75 students were followed to complete the SAIB. Re-sults After the analysis of the scale project analysis and the exploratory factor analysis,23 entries were re-tained and five common factors were extracted( verification of diagnosis,expression of symptoms,medication/treatment,consequences of illness,somatic symptom scanning),and accounted for 56.14％ of the total vari-ance.The confirmatory factor analysis identified a five factors model(SRMR=0.057,χ2/df=1.80,SRMR=0.06,RMSEA=0.05,GFI=0.912,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,IFI=0.93,PGFI=0.72,AGFI=0.89).The correla-tion validity between SAIB scale total score and treatment experience and symptoms affected in IAS scale were -0.31,-0.36 (P<0.01).Reliability coefficients of the five dimensions and total score ranged from 0.61 to 0.88,and the test-retest reliability was 0.78. Conclusion The Chinese version of the scale for the assess-ment of illness behavior is a reliable and valid instrument in Chinese.
ABSTRACT
Objective To revise rumination on sadness scale (RSS) and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version rumination on sadness scale (RSS-C) in Chinese undergraduates.Methods A total of 1 166 undergraduates from 4 universities in Hunan province completed RSS,ruminative response scale (RRS) and Beck depression inventory-Ⅱ (BDI-Ⅱ).The test-retest was conducted in 111 participants 2 weeks later.Results Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis showed the RSS-C included 11 items,consisting of causal analysis,understanding oneself and one's sadness and uncontrollability of ruminative thinking factors.The scores of each item in the high score group were significantly higher than those in the low group(P＜0.001),and the correlation between each item and the total score was significant(r=0.594-0.719,P＜0.001).The confirmatory factor analysis indicated good fit(x2/df=3.938,GFI =0.957,NFI =0.940,CFI =0.954,TLI =0.930,IFI =0.954,RMSEA =0.070).The internal consistency for RSS-C and three factors ranged from 0.694 to 0.868,and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.620 to 0.833.The scores on RSS-C and three factors were significantly associated with RRS(r=0.555-0.637,P＜0.01),BDI-Ⅱ (r=0.211-0.403,P＜0.01) respectively.Conclusion RSS-C has good reliability and validity and can be used as an effective instrument to assess rumination on sadness in Chinese undergraduates.